Interdisciplinary interplay between government programs, politics and demography as exemplified by the Polish family 500+ program: assumptions and first experiences

Abstrakt

Purpose – In 2016 the Polish government launched the Family 500+ program. This family policy instrument is regarded as a unique but debatable measure. The paper assesses the program in terms of interdisciplinary relationships between public programs, politics, sociology and demography.
Research method – The research for the paper was carried out using a qualitative case study-based method. A critical analysis of the relevant legislation, public policy assumptions, reports, and earlier studies was performed. The data contained in the Demographic Yearbook of Poland [2018, 2019, 2020] published by Statistics Poland and simple methods of descriptive statistics were also used.
Results – The conclusions from the research are that while the program’s effect on the demographic situation in Poland is limited, it helps reduce poverty, supports families and politically benefits the ruling party. They also suggest that the current sociological, social, cultural, historical, and political factors have an essential influence on how this type of programs is received by voters and on their success.
Originality / value / implications / recommendations – The program has prevented the demographic gap in Poland from widening. A new study using simulation modelling will seek to determine whether it also reduces poverty among families with children. The program’s demographic effectiveness and its effect on the female labor market should be further studied in the future.


Article received on 30 May 2021, accepted on 26 July 2021.

Bibliografia

Act, 2019, Obwieszczenie Marszałka Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 22 listopada 2019 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu ustawy o pomocy państwa w wychowywaniu dzieci, Dz.U. 2019, poz. 2407.

Aizer A., Eli S., Ferrie J., Lleras-Muney A., 2014, The long term impact of cash transfers to poor families, “National Bureau of Economic Research”, Working Paper No. 20103, pp. 1-42.

Billingsley S., Neyer G., Wesolowski K., 2018, The influence of family policies on women’s childbearing: A longitudinal micro-data analysis of 21 countries, Stockholm University Linnaeus Center on Social Policy and Family Dynamics in Europe, SPaDE, Working Paper No. 2018:04, https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.393546.1530869
888!/menu/standard/file/WP_2018_04.pdf [date of entry 21.05.2021].

Bloom D.E., Canning D., Sevilla J., 2003, The demographic dividend: a new perspective on the economic consequences of population change, RAND: A RAND Program of Policy-Relevant Research Communication, Santa Monica, Pittsburgh.

Bloom D.E., Luca D.L., 2016, The global demography of aging: facts, explanations, future, “IZA Discussion Paper”, No. 10163, pp. 1-66.

Brzeziński M., Najsztub M., 2017, The impact of “Family + Programme” on household incomes, poverty and inequality, „Polityka Społeczna”, nr 1, s. 16-25.

Chanthamith B., Wu M., Yusufzada S., Rasel Md., 2019, Interdisciplinary relationship between sociology, politics and public administration: Perspective of theory and practice. Sociology,“International Journal”, vol. 3(4), pp. 353-357, DOI: 10.15406/sij.2019.03.00198.

Chesnais J-C, 1996, Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe, “Population and Development Review”, vol. 22 (4), pp. 729-739.

Currie J., Gahvari F., 2008, Transfers in cash and in-kind: theory meets the data, “Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 46(2), pp. 333-383, DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.2.333.

Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2017, 2018, Statistics Poland, Warsaw.

Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2018, 2019, Statistics Poland, Warsaw.

Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2019, 2020, Statistics Poland, Warsaw.

Dodlova M., Giolbas A., Lay J., 2017, Non-contributory social transfer programs in developing
countries: a new dataset and research agenda data set, “Data in Brief”, vol. 16, pp. 51-64, DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.06610.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.10.00.

Dodlova M., Giolbas A., Lay J., 2018, Social transfers and conditionalities under different regime types, “European Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 50, pp. 51-64, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.10.001.

Gauthier A.H., 2001, The impact of public policies on families and demographic behaviour, paper presented at the ESF/EURESCO conference “The Second Demographic Transition in Europe”, Bad Herrenalb, Germany, pp. 1-64.

Golinowska S., Sowa-Kofta A., 2017, Combating poverty through family cash benefits. On the first results of the programme “Family 500+” in Poland, „Polityka Społeczna”, nr 1, s. 7-13.

Grundy E., Murphy M.J., 2015, Demography and public health [in:] Demography and public health, Detels R., Gulliford M., Karim Q.A, Tan Ch.Ch, Oxford University Press, Oxford, DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199661756.003.0126.

Hagemejer K., 2017, Is the 500+ child benefit programme overgenerous? Polish social protection expenditure on benefits and services for families with children compared with other member countries of the EU and OECD, „Polityka Społeczna”, nr 1, s. 1-6.

Hulme R., 2005, Policy transfer and the internationalisation of social policy, “Social Policy and Society”, vol. 4(4), pp. 417–425, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746405002605.

Khan S.R., 2012, The sociology of elites, “Annual Review of Sociology”, No. 38, pp. 361-377, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145542.

Landsburg S.E., Feinstone L.J., 1997, Macroeconomics, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
Magda I., Brzeziński M., Chłoń-Domińczak A., Kotowska I. E., Myck M., Najsztub M., Tyrowicz J., 2019, „Rodzina 500+” – Ocena programu i propozycje zmian, IBS, CenEA, GRAPE, SGH i UW, https://ibs.org.pl/news/nowy-raport-o-skutkachprogramu-rodzina-500 [date of entry: 20.03.2020].

Moffitt R., 1989, Demographic behavior and the welfare state, “Journal of Population Economics”, No. 1, pp. 237-250, DOI: 10.1007/BF00166066.

Myck M., Najsztub M., Oczkowska M., Trzciński K., 2019, Pakiet podatkowo-świadczeniowych rozwiązań rządu Zjednoczonej Prawicy, Raport Przedwyborczy CenEA, https://cenea.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/raportcenea12042019-1.pdf [date of entry: 9.07.2021].

Stiglitz J.E., 2000, Ekonomia sektora publicznego, WN PWN, Warszawa.

Wnuk-Lipiński E., 2008, Socjologia życia publicznego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.

www 1, https://businessinsider.com.pl/finanse/makroekonomia/500-plus-a-dzietnosc-nowe-urodzenia-a-rzadowy-program/0vd3p2d [date of entry: 30.03.2020].

www 2, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/73bac530-ecd4-11e5-8a81-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [date of entry: 21.05.2021].

www 3, https://www.fatherhood.gov/library-resource/changing-demography-social-safety-net-programs [date of entry: 21.05.2021].

www 4, https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2018/5/cj-v38n2-6.pdf [date of entry 21.05.2021].

www 5, https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/rodzina-500-plus [date of entry: 30.03.2020].

Article received on 30 May 2021, accepted on 26 July 2021.
Opublikowane
2021-07-26
Jak cytować
Dział
Studia i rozprawy